Does a mother have the right to transmit and implement a child's opinion aged 7-9 as a ready-made unconditional decision?

The question of whether a child's opinion from the primary school age group (7-9 years) can be the basis for unconditional decisions touches on key aspects of developmental psychology, pedagogy, family law, and ethics. The direct answer is: no, a mother does not have the right to consider a child's opinion as a ready-made unconditional decision, but she is obligated to consider and respect it, making a final decision that corresponds to the child's level of maturity, safety, and interests. This dilemma lies between two extremes: authoritarian disregard for the child's will and infantile delegation of an overwhelming responsibility.

1. Psychological aspects: cognitive and emotional abilities of a child aged 7-9

This age group (primary school) is a period of concrete operations according to Jean Piaget. The child is already capable of logical thinking, but within limited, concrete frameworks. His ability to predict and evaluate the long-term consequences of his desires is still very limited.

• Egoism: Although weakened compared to the preschool age, it still manifests. The child has difficulty fully taking into account the interests and feelings of others in complex situations (for example, when planning a family budget or choosing a school for a brother/sister).

• Present-mindedness and hedonistic motivation: Decisions are often dictated by immediate desires, emotions ('I want to now') or avoidance of discomfort ('I don't want to go to the doctor because it's scary'), rather than analysis of benefits/harm.

• Dependency on authority and seeking boundaries: A child of this age unconsciously expects adult guidance and clear boundaries. The complete transfer of the right to decide disorients and increases anxiety, as his psyche is not ready to bear such a burden. This can lead to so-called 'premature adulthood' and emotional burnout.

Example: An 8-year-old child may categorically refuse a necessary operation due to fear. Unconditionally following his opinion puts his health at risk. The mother's task is not to cancel the operation, but to recognize the fear and help overcome it, explaining the necessity of the action.

2. Legal and ethical boundaries: the responsibility of an adult

According to the Family Code of the Russian Federation (Article 63, 64), parents are responsible for the upbringing and development of their children, are required to take care of their health, physical, mental, spiritual, and moral development. They are legal representatives of their children and act in defense of their rights and interests.

• The child's right to express an opinion is enshrined in Article 57 of the Family Code of the Russian Federation and The Convention on the Rights of the Child. It must be taken into account when resolving issues affecting his interests (choice of educational institution, circle, place of rest). However, the law speaks of consideration, not unconditional submission.

• The boundary between consideration of opinion and irresponsibility: Delegating the decision-making on vital issues to a child aged 7-9 (for example, on the place of residence after a divorce, on the need for serious treatment, on the daily routine and diet) is a form of permissive parenting style and may be considered as a failure to fulfill parental obligations.

3. Risks of unconditional submission to a child's opinion

1. Delegating an overwhelming responsibility: A child whose word becomes law quickly understands that adults are not able to cope with their role. This leads to anxiety, a sense of insecurity, and overresponsibility, which is a direct path to neurosis.

2. Formation of egoism and social maladjustment: A child whose impulsive desires are unconditionally fulfilled does not learn to take into account others, negotiate, endure, and make efforts. This makes it difficult for him to integrate into any groups (school, later — work).

3. Failure to develop important skills: Decision-making is a skill that is formed gradually, under the guidance of an adult. If the decision is always ready (his opinion), the child does not learn to analyze alternatives, weigh 'pros' and 'cons', and take responsibility for the consequences.

4. Risk to safety and development: The child's opinion may contradict objective needs for safety, education, and health.

4. Constructive model: how to consider opinion when making a decision

A healthy parent's position is authoritative, not authoritarian upbringing. The adult makes the decision, but the process of making it includes the child.

• Proportionality: The issue should correspond to the child's age. The child has the right to choose which book to read at night, what jersey to wear, or what dessert to prepare on a weekend. He does not have the right to decide whether to get vaccinated or move to another city.

• Explanation and dialogue: The adult must explain why a particular decision was made, especially if it contradicts the child's immediate desire. 'I understand that you want to stay home and play, but we need to see the doctor to check your health and not get sick.'

• Providing limited choices: This is a powerful pedagogical technique. Not 'will you clean your room?', but 'will you start cleaning with toys or with books?'. This makes the child feel his agency (ability to influence the situation), but within the boundaries set by the adult.

• Recognizing emotions, even if the decision is inevitable: 'I see that you are very angry because I don't allow you to play on the computer for another hour. The rules are such. Let's think about what else you can do that is interesting'. This teaches the child to cope with frustration, not to avoid it.

Interesting fact from research: Psychologists D. Baumrind and E. Maccoby identified parenting styles. Children of authoritative parents (who combine high demands with warmth, dialogue, and consideration of opinion) demonstrate the highest level of self-regulation, social competence, and academic success. Children of permissive parents (who are just inclined to go along with the child) often have problems with self-control and low academic performance.

Conclusion

The right and obligation of a mother (parent) is to make final, balanced decisions that ensure the safety, health, and long-term well-being of the child. The child's opinion aged 7-9 is a important, mandatory to listen to and respect signal about his needs, emotions, and developing personality. However, this is raw material for adult reflection, not a ready-made verdict.

Transmitting and implementing a child's opinion as an unconditional truth means renouncing parental responsibility, harming the emotional development of the child, and depriving him of the necessary sense of security. True respect for the child is not in blind submission to his will, but in attentive dialogue, honest explanation of boundaries, and gradual transfer of responsibility as he grows up, when he will be truly ready for it. The balance between respect for autonomy and ensuring guidance is the art of parenthood.

Permanent link to this publication: