USSR's Assistance to Ghana in Achieving Independence: From Diplomacy to Economic Collapse

The assistance provided by the Soviet Union to Ghana in achieving and consolidating its independence is a vivid and controversial episode of the Cold War. It encompasses the period from Ghana's independence proclamation in 1957 to the 1966 military coup. It is a story of hopes for socialist modernization, the clash of ideologies and pragmatism, and how well-intentioned actions, ungrounded in local realities, can lead to catastrophic consequences.

The USSR saw Ghana not just as a new trading partner but as a strategic platform for extending its influence in Tropical Africa. In return, Ghana sought support from the Soviet Union to counter Western influence and as a source of resources for rapid economic growth.

Establishment of Diplomatic Relations and Initial Contacts

On March 6, 1957, the British colony of the Gold Coast gained independence and became the first country in Tropical Africa to achieve sovereignty under the name of Ghana. As early as January 4, 1957, Ghana's Prime Minister Kwame Nkrumah sent an invitation to the Chairman of the Council of Ministers of the USSR, Nikolai A. Bulganin, to the ceremony of the proclamation of independence, which evidenced his desire to establish contacts with the socialist bloc. At the ceremony, negotiations were held between the head of the Soviet delegation, I.A. Benediktov, and the Prime Minister of Ghana. On December 30, 1957, a communique was signed establishing diplomatic relations between the USSR and Ghana at the level of embassies.

Economic and Technical Assistance: Ambitious Plans and Their Consequences

The most intensive period of cooperation occurred from 1960 to 1965. In August 1960, the first key intergovernmental agreements on trade, economic, and technical, as well as cultural cooperation, were signed.

The period from 1961 to 1966 became the "golden age" of Soviet-Ghanaian relations. The Soviet Union undertook to build a series of industrial facilities in Ghana: a fishery complex, a gold refining plant, machine-building, concrete, brick and tile factories, as well as paper and cotton factories, and a hydropower station on the Black Volta River. Soviet geologists conducted prospecting for new gold, manganese, and limestone deposits. The USSR assisted in the preparation of national cadres and even participated in the development of educational programs for the Institute of Ideology named after Kwame Nkrumah.

The key but ultimately unsuccessful project was the agreement to build a thermal nuclear research reactor with a power of 2 MW, signed in February 1961. By early 1966, its launch was being prepared, but the coup put an end to this project.

However, Soviet assistance also had its downsides. Kwame Nkrumah, obsessed with the idea of accelerated industrialization and wishing to replicate the Soviet experience, adopted the recipes recommended by Moscow, which proved disastrous for agricultural Ghana. These included the introduction of a planned economy, nationalization of large enterprises and banks, state control over industry, and the creation of collective farms in the countryside. These measures did not take into account Ghanaian realities and led to an economic collapse. Most joint projects turned into costly dossiers due to errors in planning and supply.

Political Influence and the 1966 Coup

Nkrumah's domestic policy, encouraged by Soviet diplomats and experts, not only undermined the economy but also led to a decline in the standard of living of the population. This ensured the success of the military coup that took place on February 24, 1966.

The Soviet Union's reaction to the coup was inconsistent. Initially, Moscow refused to recognize the new "reactionary, pro-Western regime" and even sent a ship with arms to the shores of West Africa for Nkrumah's supporters. However, soon the ship was recalled, and the USSR restored full-fledged relations with the junta. This step was dictated by pragmatic interests: the need to return loans, maintain profitable trade, and complete the construction of already started facilities. Thus, pragmatism overshadowed ideological imperatives, marking a new stage in Soviet policy in Africa.

The cooperation between the USSR (and then Russia) and Ghana continued in subsequent decades. In the 1970s and 1980s, relations experienced periods of decline and renewal, and on the modern stage, they are based on a pragmatic basis, including cooperation in the fields of scientific education and the development of political contacts.
© library.ug

Permanent link to this publication: